WR - Evolution and Creation

05-31-2004, 11:51 AM

#16

Mercracer

Guest

Posts: n/a/0

Threads:

Friends Network

Re: Evolution and Creation

Quote:

Originally Posted by subucni

Personally, I believe 100% in evolution, and think creationists are people who are too closed minded to believe anything else. Back on topic, when the religious right tries to get creation tought in school because evolution is, it pissed me off. Evolution is tought because it is a scientific theory that has evidence to back it up.

To accept the theory of evolution as 100% fact is a leap of faith. No one has been able to actually show a definite evolution from one species to another.
The leap of faith for science is even greater when the subject of the first life showing up on Earth is focused on. As soon as scientist can demonstrate in a controlled experiment spontaneous life springing up out of a chemical mixture, then you can begin to have evidence contrary to Creation. Until then, unless evolutionary theorists are even more closed minded than religious conservatives, they must consider the possibility of influence from outside the realm of science which they understand.

| quote |

06-02-2004, 05:20 AM	#17
mrpeach32 Guest Posts: n/a/0 Threads: Friends Network	Re: Evolution and Creation I believe in Evolution, but the current theory just doesn't cut it.

	\| quote \|

Sponsored Links
REMOVE ADS

06-02-2004, 06:09 AM	#18
et82 whore Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: holland Posts: 12/0.01 Threads: 0 Friends Network	Re: Evolution and Creation well i think it does

	\| quote \|

06-03-2004, 02:18 PM

#19

mxpxbigd285

whore

Join Date: May 2004

Location: NH

Posts: 391/0.24

Threads: 2

Friends Network

Re: Evolution and Creation

Quote:

Originally Posted by aquadude

Are you familiar with the study where scientists induced mutations in fruit flies, but almost all of them died, except for the ones who grew 2 pairs of wings? Their report shows that the wing mutation wasn't helpful at all for flight, which leads to a greater finding: mutations may not necessarily be good for "evolution." While mutations may be good for influenza, the fruit fly study shows that mutations may not be beneficial for higher order creatures.

Even so, micro-evolution does not lend credibility to macro-evolution. There are still significant hurdles to overcome.

laboratory - induced mutations are not naturally ocurring mutations.

im not saying that all natural mutations may be helpful, but there is a huge different between a scientist causing such mutations and nature taking its course

| quote |