WR - Congressional Hearings

03-17-2005, 03:15 PM

koЯnut

Vagatarian

Join Date: May 2004

Location: In Your Mouth

Posts: 11,415/6.92

Threads: 465

Friends Network

Congressional Hearings

click on one of our sponsors! OR REMOVE ADS

So what do you guys think so far?

Suprised Big Mac was so emotional. Also I am glad most said what they did about Canseco's cred, and motives. Also glad to hear Raf step up and say he never took steriods.

I will add more later as the hearings go on. Hope to get some input from you guys too!

| quote |

Sponsored Links
REMOVE ADS

03-18-2005, 12:52 PM	#2
mrsnifflez whore Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Tennessee Posts: 434/0.28 Threads: 20 Friends Network	Re: Congressional Hearings Palmeiro was straight up serious business in there when he was saying he had never taken them. Personally I never thought that Raf did take them. However it is quite obvious that Giambi and Big Mac did. I'm not so sure about Sosa, I just don't think he would. Seeing Raf shake his finger at Congress made my day yesterday though.

	\| quote \|

03-20-2005, 09:45 AM	#3
joerockhead Erica Ownz me! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: 5280' Posts: 8,148/5.65 Threads: 336 Friends Network Gold Member	Re: Congressional Hearings I lost a lot of respect for McGwire. Question - If a player took Steroids, do you consider that cheating?" McGwire - "That is not for me to determine" Also - "I am here to try to turn a negative into a positive, I want to be a part of the group that goes around speaking about steroids". Yet he won't even talk about them in congress!!! Won't talk about the past, wont own up to anything. How can he talk to kids about this?

	\| quote \|

03-20-2005, 12:33 PM	#4
Wayne Brady Webhead Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Tobacco Road Posts: 1,575/1.07 Threads: 76 Friends Network	Re: Congressional Hearings McGwire look pretty bad, but you can't blame him( unless he took roids in '98). I thought Congress was doing something good until I realize that it was my congressman asking McGwire the big qestion(twice). McHenry is only there for the spotlight and to increase his name recognition, even if it means making someone else look bad or tearing down one of our heroes. In the end Congress will not touch the Anti-Trust exemption to force MLB to do the right thing.

	\| quote \|

03-20-2005, 03:40 PM	#5
koЯnut Vagatarian Join Date: May 2004 Location: In Your Mouth Posts: 11,415/6.92 Threads: 465 Friends Network	Re: Congressional Hearings ^^^ The reason the players were there were for one reason. To see if the MLB's steriod policy was going to be enough to get the drug out of the game. It wasn't to name names and prove certain people right or wrong. What they did to Mac was horrible. Did he take them?? Of course. But whats the point of bringing it up? It does nothing to solve their problem. Canseco can suck a fat one too.

	\| quote \|

Sponsored Links
REMOVE ADS

03-20-2005, 05:49 PM	#6
sakicop fuck buddy? or more? Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: RSM Posts: 81/0.06 Threads: 0 Friends Network	Re: Congressional Hearings i can't beleive they are not going to arrest these guys who were using illegal substances. its scary, but hey i guess its true celebrities don't do time, lol

	\| quote \|

03-21-2005, 01:09 AM	#7
Wayne Brady Webhead Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Tobacco Road Posts: 1,575/1.07 Threads: 76 Friends Network	Re: Congressional Hearings The thing that suprised me the most was that the MLB drug policy didn't have mandatory suspensions, and congress had to subpoena that information. That goes to show you can't trust MLB, the need to use the Anti-Trust status as a carrot.

	\| quote \|