DB

click on one of our sponsors! OR REMOVE ADS

KATIE FABER KOBE ACCUSER WROTE AN ESSAY ON THE MOVIE 'OZ ' ABOUT A BASKET
BALL PLAYER WHO RAPED A GIRL
http://www.durfee.net/oz/season4.html

Jackson Vahue
Prisoner #97V588
Actor: Rick Fox

Professional NBA basketball player. Convicted August 17, 1997. Attempted
Rape, Assault in the First Degree. Sentence: 12 years. Up for parole in 5
years. Parole denied in 2001.


---------------------------------
"I was listening to the radio at work (Sean Hannity) and some guy called
and said he's a friend of someone who went to school with the girl that
was supposedly raped, the guy sent Sean an e-mail with a link to a Vail
Colorado newspaper, apparently there was a story in the paper that said
the paper was trying to get records unsealed, the caller said that the
records that are currently sealed are 2 cases where this girl accused 2
other men of raping her.
Sean was able to get the reporter on the air (didn't catch his name),
the reporter basically said that there have been allegations made by
this woman 2 other times that turned out to be false and the newspaper
in Vail was trying to unseal these documents, they're currently fighting
it in court now.
Also another interesting note, another caller called up and said 5 days
before the incident occured a male employee was fired because the same
woman went to management and accused him of sexual harassment.
Sean is suppose to talk about the Kobe Bryant case on Hannity and Colmes
so this issue should be brought up and he'll mention the reporters name
hopefully. "

-----------------------------------------------------------

DB

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...les/2003/10/27/
those_accused_of_rape_have_rights_too/
http://reason.com/cy/cy102803.shtml



If it was so overwhelming evidence why did it take 2+ weeks of deliberation
for the DA to decide to go ahead with the charges?? ie KOBE CASESo how about
the presumption of innocence?
>
> Nobody's saying "lock him up before we see the evidence."
>
> The fact is that there's only one person who's seen all the evidence who
> is supposed to be objective and has made any sort of legitimate public
> statement, and that's the DA.
> I'm not trying to say that the DA's decision means Kobe is guilty.
> Obviously, innocent people are charged with crimes all too often.
> Nevertheless, before you call the girl a lying, golddigging whore it is
> worth remembering that there was one objective person, who saw all the
> evidence, who decided that Kobe needed to go to trial.

Just remember one thing.. The DA took a long time to figure out that
he wanted to go ahead with the case. People have said that the
collective jury's "Jaws will drop with the overwhelming evidence"...
Answer then this riddle..If it was so overwhelming evidence why did it
take 2+ weeks of deliberation for the DA to decide to go ahead with
the charges??

I doubt the DA 's case is as water tight as he would like. Each and
every day the accuser's ingetrity is getting eroded away what with
trying to commit suicide twice in the last 5 months I personally would
not want her on the witness stand.