Jimi

click on one of our sponsors! OR REMOVE ADS

This:

http://forums.webrats.com/showthread.php?t=22640

And this:

http://forums.webrats.com/showthread.php?t=22641

Were in direct response to this:

http://forums.webrats.com/showthread.php?t=22611

This:

http://forums.webrats.com/showthread.php?t=22637

This:

http://forums.webrats.com/showthread.php?t=22685

And this:

http://forums.webrats.com/showthread.php?t=22615

Sure, they may all be a little stereotypical, but politics is based on stereotypes. These are, in fact, not stereotypes, but mostly-accurate accounts of the seperate parties. I am in no way a hypocrite for starting debate in response to someone else's threads by using the actual party idealism, as true or untrue as the ideals may be from person-to-person.

Also, I figured most people would get the more-or-less sarcastic humor I laid out due to Juana's posts. People are just being a bit too touchy these days. Juana got it.

koЯnut

In defense of Jimi, I saw the thread ping-pong in the EOTH last night and did see the humor in it. And some actually had some good arguements going in them. If Juana didn't have a problem with it(and actually participated in it) it really shouldn't be a big deal.

Also, religon and politics are the most heated arguements there are. With that it is hard to bite you tongue when disagreeing with another person. Even in the EOTH. But the bell has rung and everyone has been sent to thier nuetral corners. So we can go back to argueing about the issues and not about why we are argueing.