Realtalguy

I would hope this would be an answer we can all agree on.

koЯnut

Yeah...this is getting out of hand...just circles. Mifinley we aren't redifinig the word "virgin". Jimi and I have both used the exact definition of the word in our arguements. Proving our points.
I'm not saying youre wrong with your views, just not open minded to the current outlook on sexuality today.
Plus your arguement about the Virgin Mary...you think god would have chosen her if she was a cum guzzlin, take it in the rear kind of girl. No. In his eyes she is tainted sexually. And that takes her innocents away along with her virginity.

michaeljohn

I made that argument just to try to make my point, I am deleting that post. The only proof you have made is you are trying to redefine the word virgin.

___________________________________________

Jimi

Yeah, Merriam and Wbster and I were sitting around drinking coffee the other day, and I asked them to change the meaning for this argument. Forget the fact that I copied and pasted the definition straight FROM the M-W webstie. I'm the one trying to redefine it.

koЯnut

I don't see how i'm trying to redifine a word when I'm using the EXACT definition of it. Please tell me how i'm doing this.

Jimi

mfinley, is someone who has anal or oral sex chaste, pure, or without sexual experience?

michaeljohn

This too has been covered many times in this post. The traditional definition of sexual intercourse is assumed to be coitus. That is what needs clarification.

And BongRipper has already given a list of the correct terms, look back.

Fingers, fists, etc. Digital intercourse
Oral sex, fellatio or cunnilingus

Etc

You are taking the definition of sexual intercourse to include anal intercourse wherein itself, this is not sexual intercourse as only one sexual organ is involved, not two.

All this leads you to attempt to redefine the word virgin.

___________________________________________

Jimi

mfinley, YOU are FAR redefining this word. You are the one who has tried to show translation to the word virgin, whereas we have stated the exact definition without any translation whatsoever.

koЯnut

One entry found for sexual intercourse.


Main Entry: sexual intercourse
Function: noun
1 : heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : COITUS
2 : intercourse involving genital contact between individuals other than penetration of the vagina by the penis

Hmmmm...straight from websters.

Click for link

michaeljohn

disagree entirely.

your logic:

Virgin=never having sexual intercourse
Sexual Intercourse=Includes anal intercourse (Wrong! Sexual intercourse definition is what is throwing everything off, it is traditionally assumed to imply coitus)
Experiencing Anal Intercourse=Equals loss of virginity.

Guys, I am really tired of this thread, honestly, I am to the point where I can't think of anything new and am just repeating myself.

___________________________________________

Jimi

click on one of our sponsors! OR REMOVE ADS

You're repeating yourself, but you keep dodging the actual definition. I've not once deviated from the definition. I am using words of english, and the definitions of such, as is kornut. The fact is, ANY act of sexual contact IS NOT chaste, IS NOT pure, IS NOT lacking in experience. In sexual intercourse, as was pointed it, everything sexual coutns, not just penis/vaginal sex.

michaeljohn

Your definition in bold is what destroys your case. How many times have I said the key is to be first get in her pussy with your dick! that is the traditional definition of virginity!

___________________________________________

Jimi

Uhm.... mfinley, it says OTHER than penetration of the vagina by the penis.You're skipping over words now.

michaeljohn

I agree with your points on other sexual contact not being pure or chaste, etc. But the act of doing things other than coitus do not constitute a loss of virginity.

___________________________________________