steadydiet

click on one of our sponsors! OR REMOVE ADS

state or federal government issue.

what provisions to the constition allow for an amendment of this sort. lets get out the old constitution and have a gander shall we? :rock:

roachdude

We had a gander about three months ago. Something along the lines of 8 pages of discussion. It will be hard to hit on anything new if we do another go round. :wiggle:

http://forums.webrats.com/showthread.php?t=6658

steadydiet

my bad...
i wasnt around here then...thanks for the link though

qwerty1234

It will eventually mess up children when learning how babies are concieved. (well baby daddy puts his penis in daddys rectum and/or mouth and nothing happens, no more babies, end of world. Have a nice happy sleep now.)

Jimi

qwerty, you're awfully ignorant, aren't you?

Insaniteus

Homesexuality was very accepted and considered normal in Ancient Rome, and they did perfectly fine for 1000 years.

And we've got more kids who need adoption than gay couples, so we're in no danger of "no more babies" lol. We have too many as-is.

-Insaniteus-

schutzenkonig

This is much different than the morality debate that you mentioned roachfood.


This is about the rights of the states, something that should be discussed because in the thread you mentioned, many people said that there should be a national poll to decide whether there should be gay marriage or not. Why should the opinions of people living in one state affect the laws of another? Why would anyone want this to be a nationwide debate? I can tell you why I think they want that. I think that they want it nationwide because they cannot possibly accept that another state might set a law in the contrary to their position. They want that because they want to impose their views on everyone in the country when in fact, the states are much different in culture and beliefs. What may work well in one state will likely fail in another.