Juan.©amaney

I voted against it.

To me, marriage by the government doesn't mean shit but a way for them to keep track of it, and allow legal action to control it, be it by divorce or by tax breaks etc. Most progressive companies already offer same sex couples the same benefits traditional couples get.

Marriage to me only exists as a religious rite and I'd rather not discuss that here.

Reason I voted against it doesn't have anything to do with whether or not I accept the fact that two dudes or two chicks wanna bump uglies monogomously. I voted against it because it opens up the doors to a lot of sticky situations (pun may or may not have been intended). It's too easy to take advantage of. Say for instance I live with a buddy of mine. We can get married and continue about our manly ways, but we'd get tax breaks that single people otherwise cannot get; income, purchasing/selling of a home, health care, etc. Then also (and this is where a lot of people will jump in and scream bloody murder) where would you draw the line? The argument is, two concenting adults, great. What if I want to marry my sister? My mom? My dad? Not that I want to have hot incest love, if I did I'd move to the south. But I want to get my family under my health care provided by my employer, so why isn't this allowed?

___________________________________________